Deep sedation with propofol for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in children, administered by specially trained pediatricians: a prospective case series with emphasis on side effects.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: The need to administer procedural sedation to children has increased in recent years, as has experience in this field among nonanesthesiologists. Using propofol makes it easier to achieve sufficiently deep sedation. There is a considerable literature on the administration of propofol by nonanesthesiologists for gastroscopy in adults, but very few data are available on this issue in children. The aim of the present study was to assess the safety and efficacy of procedural sedation with propofol for gastroscopy in a pediatric ward with trained personnel and monitoring facilities. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A training protocol was developed to educate nurses and residents. Children requiring gastroscopy were included in the study prospectively and underwent procedural sedation with propofol administered by nonanesthesiologists. RESULTS: A total of 811 upper gastrointestinal endoscopies were carried out with procedural sedation. Sedation was achieved in all procedures, and all but three (0.4%) were conducted successfully. None of the patients required intubation. Stridor with signs of upper airway obstruction occurred in 14 of the 811 procedures (1.7%). Laryngoscopy was required to manage difficulties in introducing the gastroscope in 16 of the 811 procedures (2.0%). Major desaturation requiring a short course of ventilation occurred in six procedures (0.7%), and transient desaturation that resolved spontaneously occurred in 97 of the procedures (12%). CONCLUSIONS: Administration of propofol by nonanesthesiologists for gastroscopy examinations in children was successful in this study, but was associated with a small risk of potentially severe complications. Although the residents were generally able to administer procedural sedation alone, constant and immediate availability of anesthesiological support continues to be mandatory.

Prevalence of autoimmune disorders in relatives of patients with celiac disease.

Celiac disease (CD) is frequently associated with an autoimmune disorder (AD). The aim of the study was to establish if an AD is more frequent than expected in relatives of CD patients and, in particular, if it is related to the presence of silent unrecognised CD. We also evaluated the prevalence of ADs in CD patients and compared it with that in a control series. A structured questionnaire was used to evaluate the prevalence of ADs in 125 (51 males and 74 females with a mean age of 8.9 years) children with CD (group A), 125 (67 males and 58 females with a mean age of 8.1 years) matched "healthy" children (group B), all 1352 first- and second-degree relatives of the 125 children with CD (group C), all 1238 first- and second-degree relatives of the control group B of "healthy" children (group D), and all 205 first- and second-degree relatives of 20 children with AD (group E). We also used the antiendomysium antibody assay to screen 354 of the 373 first-degree relatives of group C. An AD was present in 9 of the 125 (7.2%) children with CD (group A), in 1 of the 125 (0.8%) healthy children (group B), in 67 of the 1352 (4.9%) relatives of CD patients (group C), in 14 of the 1238 (1.1%) relatives of healthy children (group D), and in 7 of the 205 (3.4%) of relatives of patients with AD (group E). Clinically silent CD was found in 20 of the 354 first-degree relatives of CD patients (5.6%), and the risk of silent CD was significantly higher, reaching 25% (4/16) in the subgroup of relatives also affected by another AD. Relatives of CD patients had an increased prevalence of AD compared to control groups, and relatives of CD patients with ADs, have a risk as high as 25% of being silent celiacs: they should thus be screened for CD.